![]() That's 9,331,200 pixels in Reverb vs 8,294,400 in your TV, but VR tends to be 90fps vs 60 of tv, so you need about 68% more GPU power to sustain Reverb's native resolution. The Reverb is 2160x2160 per eye, that's combined resolution of 4320x2160. I would also be able to upgrade in the future when PC hardware starts to catch up? Perhaps my computer is not currently capable of outputting max resolution, but I can't see how it would not do a better job of displaying the same res as the HP Reverb. There's no hardware in existence that can run it, and we won't see true 8K VR in many years to come, as GPUs tend to improve by about 50% each cycle which typically lasts 2 years. ACC can runs fairly well on 2080Ti in 4K 60fps, but 8K is actually 4 times that resolution (pixel count) and VR is usually 90fps, that's 6x times the processing power required. There isn't really anything better than Reverb, and even if it was, the most powerful GPU on the market wouldn't be able to run it. It's a niche product, so you're risking more in terms of support and compatibility. 4K per eye = 8K according to Pimax, but because it's upscaled and stretched over wider fov it will probably look much worse than Reverb. It's only 2560×1440 per eye, upscaled to 4K. Pimax isn't really 8K, it's BS marketing. You can always adjust the amount of super sampling, so you can run something like AC at higher resolution, but with ACC you will have to lower it, losing some clarity to get 90fps. If you can run 4k at 60fps, then you can VR. Your 77" tv is still 4k, size doesn't matter, just the resolution. Although a lot of people are happy with the lower resolution headsets like rift and vive. It's a lot better, to a point where it's a lot more acceptable. Since I have Reverb, if I'm serious about racing and realism, I will use that instead. It was just borderline acceptable for me, so most of the time I didn't bother. I used to have Oculus Rift and after using it for a while, I actually preferred to play those games on my OLED TV, because Rift was a first gen product, and had really low resolution. If it's realism and immersion, nothing beats VR, even though you lose a lot of the image fidelity. It's an experience on a completely different level. VR makes you feel like you're actually sitting in the car, it's much easier to put good times in, because you can judge distances better, look to apex etc. But you're driving while looking through a window, everything is off, field of view, all the references aren't like real life. Sitting on your couch in front of an OLED tv is more comfortable and the image is better. One isn't necessarily better than the other. You sacrifice image clarity for immersion. That person seems a bit overcritical of VR and a bit clueless/naive. The field of view is so big that you would need 8k per eye or something like that and there's no PC that can handle that. There's no way you can get monitor/tv quality graphics in VR. Those comments are true for VR in general, not the Reverb, which is actually one of the highest resolution HMDs. ![]() So, VR probably wouldn't give me the same graphics performance? I should also point out that my Xbox and PC are connected to my 77" LG OLED TV. I'm not by any means trying to compare the two as my expectations were set that this was going to be a much lower resolution and it's sacrificed against the VR immersion, but half of the time the guy would not even run correctly and had to be reset. "Even though it's advertised as a 2K screen, the quality is just not there yet when compared to my monitor or OLED screen. I have a brand new PC with an I7 & 2080 Ti with the latest drivers, and the games that I'm expecting to see run decently (Assetto Corsa, Project Cars 2), are just not optimized for VR yet. I have tried the Valve Index and now the HP Reverb, and I'm sad to say that VR is not there yet. That HP Reverb has pretty terrible reviews? There's also Dirt Rally 2.0 which is pretty good if you want try rallying. One of the best looking and realistic games, but limited to one series and still work in progress. It has insane mod support, with great community, so you can load it with additional cars and tracks.ĪCC is an official blancpain gt game, with brand new engine, looks and sounds great, but quite demanding. PC2 is well polished with decent career modes, best weather/surface simulation, good VR support.ĪC is a bit older with weaker graphics, but will run better in VR at something like giving you a really crisp image. ![]() That's more demanding than It's the best head mounted display for sim racing that doesn't cost $$$$.Īs for those games, they all have pros and cons. Get yourself an HP Reverb, it's 2160x2160 per eye at 90fps. VR is very demanding, it's even going to make 2080ti sweat.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |